Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3250 is 875 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 239 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than FX-6200 - €22.7 vs €42.6
- Up to 50% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6200 - €0.09 vs €0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G3250 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,2 GHz 3M 53W LGA1150
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
