Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3705 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - €42.6 vs €103.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 5600 - €0.47 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 129% better in FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - 208 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |