Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 1013 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |