Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1336 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Phenom II X4 830 - 152 vs 148 FPS
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
148
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Vishera | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |