Buy on Amazon
€29.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €29.22 vs €559.83
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900F - €0.14 vs €1.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 38% better in Battlefield V than FX-4300 - 286 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Serie FX-4300 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 4M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz
Buy for €559.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
