Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €29.22 vs €299.41
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-10900F - €0.15 vs €1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than FX-4300 - 207 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
10%
Price, €
€299.41
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |