Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1590 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than FX-4130 - 611 vs 595 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
611
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |