Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1358 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - €20.59 vs €151.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-6700 - €0.18 vs €1.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-4100 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for €151.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |