Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €19.79 vs €288.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-4670T - €0.09 vs €1.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-4100 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €19.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |