Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 189 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon W-3175X - 312 vs 298 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 225 vs 255 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 128 vs 56 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Xeon W |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Server | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 28 |
128 | Threads | 56 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 255 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |