Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i7-5650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1620 days newer than Core i7-5650U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-5650U - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 15 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
984
81.72757475083057%
Multi-Core
1866
15.837718553726024%
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
