Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 492 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than EPYC 7742 - 767 vs 754 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |