Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 308 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than EPYC 7742 - 529 vs 527 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 180 vs 225 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
529
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rome | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |