Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 615 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7742 - 182 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Rome | Codename | Cezanne |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
