Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 2479 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8350 - 169 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Rome | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |