Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1488 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551 - 124 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |