Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than EPYC 7551 - 290 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€284.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €284.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
942
40.76157507572479%
Multi-Core
5942
65.44773653486067%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |