Buy on Amazon
€174.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 946 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than EPYC 7302P - 90 vs 83 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 35 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€174.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-7700T 2,90GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €174.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
