Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 671 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than EPYC 7282 - 783 vs 759 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 91 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
783
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |