Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1572 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - €80.0 vs €237.87
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 3000G - 176 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74874 minutes ago
Buy for €237.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74873 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
64.66216216216216%
Multi-Core
1975
40.33081478456197%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |