Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1906 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 23 than Athlon 3000G - 201 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
82.78546712802768%
Multi-Core
1975
36.04014598540146%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |