Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €80.0 vs €347.08
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 44% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 3000G - 723 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75245 minutes ago
Buy for €347.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
35.963923337091316%
Multi-Core
1975
12.762520193861066%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |