Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 580 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - €69.0 vs €261.39
- Up to 73% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen 7 2700 - €0.44 vs €1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Athlon 3000G - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.2GHz, 8 Kerne, Socket AM4) YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
