Key Differences
In short — Velztorm Armix CTO outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 49% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than EMCA4 - 142 vs 95 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2953
100%
Multi-Core
17898
100%
CPU Winner
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2773
94%
Multi-Core
15748
88%
Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
