Key Differences
In short — SYSTEMTREFF High-End outperforms GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than GameMachines Cube - - 636 vs 633 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 376 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
155th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
155th Variation
Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
68%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
155th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2117
88%
Multi-Core
11070
94%
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2402
100%
Multi-Core
11831
100%
CPU Winner
SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X3D | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| Radeon RX 6800 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
