Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 62% better in Overwatch 2 than GameMachines Cube - - 312 vs 192 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
6th Variation
FPS
192
62%
Value, €/FPS
€7.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1412 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
6th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
91%
Multi-Core
13549
87%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
