Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms STGAubron on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 38% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than STGAubron - 130 vs 94 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
70%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
96%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-11700KF
3.6 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2257
82%
Multi-Core
10185
65%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700KF | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
