Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 88% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 173 vs 92 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
3rd Variation
EMCA4 Computer PC
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
44%
EMCA4 Computer PC
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
EMCA4 Computer PC
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2773
100%
Multi-Core
15748
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
