Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than Megaport - €849.0 vs €1399.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €8.03 vs €10.14 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 29% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 138 vs 107 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
448th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
448th Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
100%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
98%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
