Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Kiebel on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Kiebel - 472 vs 315 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Kiebel - €3.05 vs €4.12 per FPS
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than Memory - €1299.00 vs €1439.00
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
447th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
447th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
41%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
447th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
