Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Megaport - €799.00 vs €1899.00
- Up to 24% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €7.91 vs €10.38 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 81% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 183 vs 101 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 622 minutes ago
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 618 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
382nd Variation
36th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
382nd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
40%
36th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
36th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
