Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 22% cheaper than Megaport - €1129.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Megaport - €9.33 vs €10.13 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than Memory - 143 vs 121 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
427th Variation
FPS
121
84.61538461538461%
Value, €/FPS
€9.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1129
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9351 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.13/FPS
92.10266535044423%
Price, €
€1449
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
427th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
427th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
80.91647331786542%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.34880803011292%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
93.37991908789996%
Multi-Core
13890
91.55022409702083%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |