Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 22% cheaper than Megaport - €1129.0 vs €1449.0
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 30% better in Valheim than Memory - 114 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Valheim than Memory - €12.71 vs €12.83 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
427th Variation
FPS
88
77.19298245614034%
Value, €/FPS
€12.83/FPS
99.06469212782541%
Price, €
€1129
100%
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9308 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
114
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1449
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
427th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
427th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
80.91647331786542%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.34880803011292%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
93.37991908789996%
Multi-Core
13890
91.55022409702083%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |