Key Differences
In short — Formacom outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than Formacom - €1129.0 vs €2855.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Formacom - €9.65 vs €13.22 per FPS
Advantages of Formacom PC
- Performs up to 85% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 216 vs 117 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
427th Variation
FPS
117
54.166666666666664%
Value, €/FPS
€9.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1129
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5667 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.22/FPS
72.99546142208774%
Price, €
€2855
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,855 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
427th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
427th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
55.81232492997199%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
34.19117647058824%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
427th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
null-core
Single-Core
2719
87.68139309900033%
Multi-Core
15172
72.24761904761905%
Memory PC | vs | Formacom PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |