Key Differences
In short — Kiebel outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 22% cheaper than Kiebel - €1129.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Minecraft than Kiebel - €1.88 vs €1.94 per FPS
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Minecraft than Memory - 745 vs 599 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
427th Variation
FPS
599
80.40268456375838%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1129
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8602 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
745
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
96.90721649484536%
Price, €
€1449
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
427th Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
427th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
80.50505050505052%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
50.324675324675326%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2317
85.21515262964326%
Multi-Core
10125
66.7347745847614%
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |