Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Megaport - €839.00 vs €1499.00
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 94% better in World of Tanks than Memory - 309 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.85 vs €5.28 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6804 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
309
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
55%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6801 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
339th Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
339th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
44%
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
