Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 23% better in Control than Megaport - 130 vs 106 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 6% better value when playing Control than Megaport - €10.65 vs €11.38 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
31st Variation
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.38/FPS
93.58523725834797%
Price, €
€1479
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
19th Variation
FPS
106
81.53846153846153%
Value, €/FPS
€10.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
Value Winner
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
31st Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
19th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
97.33822854520422%
Multi-Core
9729
81.8732643271901%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
