Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €2639.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €6.6 vs €11.0 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 98% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 240 vs 121 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
320th Variation
FPS
121
50.416666666666664%
Value, €/FPS
€6.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2358 minutes ago
Buy for €2,639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
320th Variation
26th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
320th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.655462184873947%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.426470588235293%
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
320th Variation
Core i9-11900F
null-core
Single-Core
2171
69.85199485199485%
Multi-Core
9171
43.58426005132592%
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
null-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
