Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 186% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Memory - 63 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 65% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Memory - €12.68 vs €36.32 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
320th Variation
FPS
22
34.92063492063492%
Value, €/FPS
€36.32/FPS
34.91189427312775%
Price, €
€799
100%
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2572 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
320th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
320th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45.114309906858594%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39.475021168501264%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
null-core
Single-Core
1555
71.62597881160755%
Multi-Core
6199
67.59350125395268%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
