Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 86 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 25% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.06 vs €12.15 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 3% cheaper than Memory - €749.0 vs €769.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 370 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
287th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
287th Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
42%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |