Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 23% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Memory - 86 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Memory - €1249.0 vs €1659.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Memory - €14.52 vs €23.7 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
259th Variation
FPS
70
81.3953488372093%
Value, €/FPS
€23.7/FPS
61.26582278481013%
Price, €
€1659
75%
Buy for €1,659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6524 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
259th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
259th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
74.6830985915493%
Multi-Core
9729
55.243881664868546%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
