Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Kiebel outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 35% better in Control than Memory - 147 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Memory - €1449.0 vs €1659.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Control than Memory - €9.86 vs €15.22 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
259th Variation
FPS
109
74.14965986394559%
Value, €/FPS
€15.22/FPS
64.7831800262812%
Price, €
€1659
87%
Buy for €1,659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6643 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
259th Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
259th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61.464646464646464%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62.1933621933622%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2317
81.58450704225352%
Multi-Core
10125
57.49247629322583%
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700K | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |