Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 30% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Captiva - 169 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Captiva - €14.61 vs €16.15 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 15% cheaper than Memory - €2099.0 vs €2469.0
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6758 minutes ago
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
25th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
59%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
