Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Captiva is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Captiva - 288 vs 282 FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 5% cheaper than Memory - €2339.0 vs €2469.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing War Thunder than Memory - €8.29 vs €8.57 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Memory PC Gaming Aufrüst PC (Intel Core i9 13900K 24x 5.8 GHz, 32 GB DDR4 RAM, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB ohne SSD/Windows) Gamer Gehäuse mit Glasfenster
Buy for €2,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
Captiva PC Highend Gaming I79-888 | Intel Core i7 14700KF | Mainboard Z790 | 64GB DDR5 RAM | NVIDIA Geforce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | 2TB M.2 SSD | Win11 Home
Buy for €2,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Memory PC
25th Variation
Captiva PC
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Captiva PC
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
82%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
