Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper STGsivir on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGsivir is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 81% better in Minecraft than STGsivir - 878 vs 485 FPS
Advantages of STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than Memory - €1003.4 vs €2789.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Minecraft than Memory - €2.07 vs €3.18 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €2,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
485
55.23917995444191%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1003.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,003.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
24th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30.399144689950102%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
26.132632961260672%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
6th Variation
Core i7-8700B
3.2 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1533
51.546738399462%
Multi-Core
5875
29.159221758983524%
Memory PC | vs | STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-8700B |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
