Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than Megaport - 198 vs 150 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Memory - €919.0 vs €1769.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Memory - €6.13 vs €8.93 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74832 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
150
75.75757575757575%
Value, €/FPS
€6.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€919
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
6th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40.85249042145593%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31.768837803320565%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i9-11900
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2130
100%
Multi-Core
8816
90.61568506526878%
18th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
99.5774647887324%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
