Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 16% cheaper than Captiva - €1949.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Valorant than Captiva - €2.36 vs €2.57 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Memory - 899 vs 825 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
231st Variation
FPS
825
91.7686318131257%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1949
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77851 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
231st Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
231st Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
74.4119743406985%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
82.25869993434011%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
231st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
71.29411764705881%
Multi-Core
9729
50.58230217323489%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |