Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 40% better in Rust than GameMachines Cube - - 195 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than GameMachines Cube - - €11.84 vs €12.22 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than Captiva - €1699.0 vs €2309.0
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 964 minutes ago
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
6th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
72%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79%
Multi-Core
11527
59%
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
