Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 81% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cube - - 107 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cube - - €20.93 vs €22.86 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than Memory - €1349.00 vs €2239.00
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,239 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
159th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
159th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
159th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2991
100%
Multi-Core
20110
100%
CPU Winner
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2536
85%
Multi-Core
13687
68%
Memory PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
