Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 48% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 172 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 0% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €7.90 vs €7.92 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 32% cheaper than Memory - €919.00 vs €1359.00
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 723 minutes ago
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 722 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
204th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
204th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
32%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
204th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
