Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 48% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 102 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Megaport - €1379.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €13.52 vs €21.0 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 657 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
69
67.64705882352942%
Value, €/FPS
€21/FPS
64.38095238095238%
Price, €
€1449
95%
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
204th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
204th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41.15657761244505%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
46.64502164502164%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
204th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
82.39464356045687%
Multi-Core
8659
62.339812814974806%
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
